Found myself browsing these anti-graffiti websites with loads of statistics:
The National Council to Prevent Delinquency which is dedicated to stop the misuse and abuse of consumer products in general and spray paint in particular.
Robert Hills, the Executive Director, makes the valid point that
- most graffiti vandals subscribe to a value system so divergent from that of the society in general that they require substantial reorientation and redirection to avoid recidivism.
Graffiti Hurts suggests for graffiti writers to enroll in an expensive art school and/or leave the country (“train overseas”) or when that tagging compulsion starts to take over go plant a tree, play sports or volunteer. See the “
Do You Write?” page..
Check out their teacher’s tools: one of the more interesting activities is to have the students anthropomorphize a defaced wall and have it confront its perpetrators.
The Baltimore Mural Program is provided as an example of a program that “discourages tagging in favor of public displays of positive community images.” (Looking through the images, I wonder if these murals actually represent a master narrative of community connectedness and harmony when the graffiti artist is representing a different reality..)
Tony Parkes conducted a survey in the UK, The Use of Community Art Projects and Murals as a Means of Controlling Graffiti, and the conclusions he draws are quite progressive, proposing the creation of “graffiti galleries”—free spaces for graffiti writers to create pieces. After all, graffiti writers are community members, too.
Differing Realities:

This legally executed mural was protested by the local community who found its content “aggressive.”