While browsing the forum at 12oz Prophet I came across a discussion of Matt McCormick’s film “The Subconscious Art of Graffiti Removal,” which argues that city workers buffing graffiti are actually subconsciously creating modern art masterpieces a la Rothko. The film looks really interesting (best part: Miranda July is the narrator), and there is an excerpt on the website, but I’ll have to try later and locate it somewhere in its entirety.
Graffiti writers and sympathizers disagree with the argument of the film. A particularly astute comment was this:
“modern art”, as they so elegantly call it, is the biggest sham since organized religion. to say that the people removing graffiti are subconscious artists is an utter fallacy based on a delusion. these people are NOT subconsciously creating art…they are consciously suppressing it.
Based on the short excerpt of the film, I think it was intended to be little more tongue in cheek than the commentor took it, but this isn’t the first time someone has come up with the realization that buffed graffiti bears quite a resemblence to certain revered pieces of modern art.
Ayme Frye sent me a flyer for an exhibition called “
Painted-Over Graffiti” that she saw in Chicago a few months ago by a photographer named Jeff Laird. He went as far as creating sculpture based on the “irregular color-fields” left behind by the anti-graffiti task forces, even proposing massive monuments to them. The major let-down of his work is the obvious omission of any discussion about the graffiti under his glorified irregular color-fields.
It is apparent to me, that the art in graffiti removal is in the selection by other artists to bring attention to the particularly aesthetically appealing examples of it. For, as most of us know, most buffed graffiti is pretty unspectacular.

“...Wait, which one is the Art?”